<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Comparación de clientes web para SIG v.5</title>
		<description>Discusión Comparación de clientes web para SIG v.5</description>
		<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:08:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/265/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Re:</title>
			<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-330</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Leaflet is definitely in the list of new additions. Thanks radek!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>tuxman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:04:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-330</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>LeafletJS</title>
			<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Escellent post! Perhaps LeafletJS [http://leaflet.cloudmade.com/] might be worth adding to next version.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>radek</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:19:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-323</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: MapGuide OS</title>
			<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-291</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi, thanks for pointing this out. MapGuide OS should be in the comparison since it has its own client called Ajax viewer. By the way, there is a delay on the v.6 of the comparison due to my master studies.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>tuxman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:38:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-291</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MapGuide OS</title>
			<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-290</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why is MapGuide not on the system map? Where should it be?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bpelhos</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:22:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-290</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>English version</title>
			<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-282</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The English translation of the comparison v.5 has been published. It's available at: http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/en/component/k2/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>tuxman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:16:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-282</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Russian version</title>
			<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-271</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From now on, the comparison has a Russian version! Visit it: http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/ru/component/k2/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5.html Thanks to the user Mavka (http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=1345&Itemid=70). :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>tuxman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:37:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-271</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>translation</title>
			<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-268</link>
			<description><![CDATA[tuxman 1. I can read (basically) and use spanish version. 2. Good, i'l begin.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mavka</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:06:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-268</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>translation</title>
			<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-267</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Mavka, we can split the article in two parts, 1. the tables and 2. the whole text. 1. I can send you the files (css, html) you need to translate the tables, give me a couple of days to send you the english version. 2. Regarding the whole text, you may send it to me in a txt file. Once you have given me the txt and the tables translated into Russian I will post the Russian version of the article. Thanks! :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>tuxman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:36:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-267</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>translation</title>
			<link>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-266</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How can I create russian translation of this article and host it here?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mavka</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:58:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php/es/geo-blogs/item/265-comparacion-de-clientes-web-para-sig-v5#comment-266</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
